Should executives be held responsible for data breaches?

Table of Contents

Share at:

On 27 September, it was announced by the Board of Equifax that CEO Richard Smith amongst other executives had stepped down from their roles following the disclosure of a hacking scandal. It was alleged that the perpetrators gained unauthorised access to sensitive personal data held by Equifax, including social security numbers, birth dates and home addresses. Over 143 million Americans were exposed – nearly half the country’s population.

It was alleged that the hack was possible because Equifax failed to act on warnings to fix a software security problem.

Law Reform: Should executives be held accountable?

The story has been attracting attention for a reason other than just the privacy breach. Those who were responsible face the prospect of walking free. Smith would be able to enjoy his retirement that includes a large pension and other executives would have the benefit of keeping the profit from the sale of stock that they transacted before publicly announcing the breach.

The policy question remains: is it fair for executives to walk free in the face of damage done to millions of Americans?

This was the subject of intense debate in the US Congressional Hearing in Washington which Smith attended on 3 October 2017. Many were of the view that it was not justified that executives not only avoid the repercussions but were able to leave with all the benefits. Sen. Elizabeth Warren pushed for legislative reform that penalises executives and companies that fail to take reasonable measures for cyber safety and that result in public harm.

On the other hand, Smith maintained that punitive measures are not ideal given that the company plays a ‘vital role in the economy.’

Final Thoughts

Whilst the Equifax hacking incident is primarily focused on accountability of fault-bearing executives, another message is clear. In today’s technologically advanced society, hackers are finding more and more ways to access private information. Therefore, especially for data-holding companies, this calls for more advanced countermeasures as well as tech-savvy personnel to reduce the risk of such occurrences taking place.

Let us know your thoughts on the Equifax scandal as well as the frailty of privacy by tagging us #lawpath or @lawpath

Share at:

Simplify creating legal documents today

Browse through Lawpath's AI tools which can be used to draft, review and refine legal documents today!

Related Articles

Fixed Term Contract Termination: Legal Or Not?

Have you ever wondered whether the termination of fixed term contracts is legal? Read this article to find out.

Legal and Accounting Topics covered in Advice Plans

As the financial year wraps up, it’s the perfect opportunity to step out of the day-to-day grind and set your business up for future success.

What To Do If You’ve Lost Your Tax File Number (2026 Update)

If you've lost your TFN or if it's been stolen, you'll want to act right away. Read this guide to find out how you can recover it.

When Is It OK to Threaten Legal Proceedings?

It is quite common for people to threaten legal proceedings. Find out more about whether you can threaten legal proceedings in your case.

Business Partner vs Co-Founder: What’s The Difference?

A co-founder and a business partner may sound like similar roles, but in reality they are very different. Read about it in this article.

How Much Should You Pay a Lawyer in Australia: A Guide 

Want to know how much hiring a lawyer will cost? Find out how your lawyer will charge and how to minimise your fees here.