Should executives be held responsible for data breaches?

Table of Contents

Share at:

On 27 September, it was announced by the Board of Equifax that CEO Richard Smith amongst other executives had stepped down from their roles following the disclosure of a hacking scandal. It was alleged that the perpetrators gained unauthorised access to sensitive personal data held by Equifax, including social security numbers, birth dates and home addresses. Over 143 million Americans were exposed – nearly half the country’s population.

It was alleged that the hack was possible because Equifax failed to act on warnings to fix a software security problem.

Law Reform: Should executives be held accountable?

The story has been attracting attention for a reason other than just the privacy breach. Those who were responsible face the prospect of walking free. Smith would be able to enjoy his retirement that includes a large pension and other executives would have the benefit of keeping the profit from the sale of stock that they transacted before publicly announcing the breach.

The policy question remains: is it fair for executives to walk free in the face of damage done to millions of Americans?

This was the subject of intense debate in the US Congressional Hearing in Washington which Smith attended on 3 October 2017. Many were of the view that it was not justified that executives not only avoid the repercussions but were able to leave with all the benefits. Sen. Elizabeth Warren pushed for legislative reform that penalises executives and companies that fail to take reasonable measures for cyber safety and that result in public harm.

On the other hand, Smith maintained that punitive measures are not ideal given that the company plays a ‘vital role in the economy.’

Final Thoughts

Whilst the Equifax hacking incident is primarily focused on accountability of fault-bearing executives, another message is clear. In today’s technologically advanced society, hackers are finding more and more ways to access private information. Therefore, especially for data-holding companies, this calls for more advanced countermeasures as well as tech-savvy personnel to reduce the risk of such occurrences taking place.

Let us know your thoughts on the Equifax scandal as well as the frailty of privacy by tagging us #lawpath or @lawpath

Share at:

Simplify creating legal documents today

Browse through Lawpath's AI tools which can be used to draft, review and refine legal documents today!

Related Articles

Annual ASIC Company Renewals: A Complete Guide

Are you aware that your company needs to be renewed annually with ASIC? This article explains how and why it’s important.

Business Valuation Australia: The 2027 Tax Deadline

From 1 July 2027, what your business was worth on 30 June sets your future CGT bill, even if you never sell. Here's why it matters.

Casual Loading: When Do Employers Pay It?

Employers should be aware of when they need to pay their employees casual loading. Keep reading to find out when this applies.

Can I use my Residential Address as my Registered Office Address?

FInd out how to add a residential address to your company and update your company address after registration.

Can an Offer of Employment be Withdrawn?

Can an offer of employment be withdrawn? Read this article to find out when an employer can and can’t withdraw an offer of employment.

Are Unpaid Internships Legal in Australia?

Unpaid internships benefit employers and students. But are unpaid internships legal in Australia? Read this article to find out.