Data Breach Puts Details of 96,000 Public Servants at Risk

Table of Contents

Share at:

The confidential information of 96,000 public servants was put at risk after a recent data breach. The Australian Public Service Commission (APSC) was forced to remove the data set from public access after fears that the information would no longer be secure. It was reported to have been downloaded nearly 60 times before it was removed.

Users’ privacy on your website is vital. If you have a website and would like to create a privacy policy or have your existing privacy policy amended, contact a LawPath consultant. Alternatively you can access our ready to use and customisable Privacy Policy.

What happened?

The data set, on the government’s open data portal, contained information from the Australian Public Service (APS) Employee Census. The annual census records viewpoints from staff about management and workplace conditions. While names and contact details were not taken down, the identification codes for departments and agencies could be linked back to individual public servants who filled out the census.

This comes less than a week after the Medicare data breach, in which patients’ personal data was feared to have been made public. The data on the Medicare Benefits and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme was removed by the Health Department after it was found that practitioner details could be decrypted. Patient details were not recorded in the Medicare data sets, however there were links to some doctor and healthcare provider numbers. Meaning there was potential for doctors and what they prescribed to be identified.

After the health data leak, Attorney-General George Brandis announced changes to the Privacy Act, which would make re-identifying anonymised government data a criminal offence. These amendments aimed to protect government data that was open for public use. The anonymised APS Employee Census data was accessed 58 times before it was removed. This means that it will be unable to be controlled whether the information is used or further distributed.

Is public government data safe anymore?

The latest privacy scare demonstrates the tenuous relationship between rapid technological developments and the government’s ability to quickly implement effective legislation. By attaching agency identifiers to the data, it was possible for individuals to be identified in the anonymised data. It is important that all individuals are confident in the security of their information. Possible reforms in 2017 can ensure this remains a priority.

Let us know your thoughts on the latest privacy data scare by tagging us #lawpath or @lawpath.

Share at:

Simplify creating legal documents today

Browse through Lawpath's AI tools which can be used to draft, review and refine legal documents today!

Related Articles

A Guide to NES: The 11 Employment Entitlements

Understanding an employers obligations under NES is extremely important. Read on for more about NES: The 11 Employment Entitlements.

What’s the Difference Between Redundancy and Severance Pay?

Upon termination employees are often entitled to different forms of compensation. Here we discuss two of them - redundancy and severance pay.

Contractor Versus Subcontractor: What’s the Difference? (2026 Update)

As a business owner, it's likely you'll have to hire a contractor and subcontractor at some point. Read this guide to find out what they are.

Garden Leave: Advantages and Disadvantages

Wondering if you should have a garden leave clause in your employment contract? Check out the advantages and disadvantages of garden leave.

What is Long Service Leave in Western Australia?

Long Service Leave in Western Australia may have different requirements to other Australian jurisdictions.

What Is Long Service Leave in New South Wales?

Long service leave entitlements vary depending on which state you work in. Learn more about entitlements to long service leave (NSW) here.