Internet Giant Google takes a record $3.57 billion fine

Table of Contents

Share at:

This is what happened yesterday when Google was fined a record of $3.57 billion by an EU competition regulator for breach of antitrust rules. To give some context, the original record for fines of this nature was $1.56 billion, awarded to Intel in 2009. The EU agency awarded the fine due to alleged attempts by Google to modify its search engine processes to provide illegal competitive advantages to its own products. In effect, Google products were placed first in searches while rival products would not appear until page 4 of searches. Firstly, this meant that consumers did not have a genuine range of options to choose from during shopping and secondly, this constituted anti-competitive conduct that is detrimental to the online shopping industry.

The Consequences

The fine devalued Google’s stock prices and this triggered a domino effect, causing other related major companies to drop in stock prices. The parent company, Alphabet lost up to $8.5 billion in value and various related stocks such as NASDAQ and Facebook fell in values of up to 1.61% and 5% respectively.

Financial losses aside, Google’s loss of reputation is arguably the most damaging for the corporation. Historically, many firms in similar positions have had themselves losing the best university talent to other competitors.

Context into the Competition Law

Antitrust law is basically another term for Competition Law. In Australia business competition is regulated by an independent body, the Australian Consumer and Competition Commission (ACCC) which operates under the Consumer and Competition Act 2010 (Cth).

In essence, the body promotes fair competition within Australian businesses and prevents any anti-competitive conduct – such as illegal monopolisation.

Final Thoughts

In this day and age, so much of our world’s progress stems from our prominent culture of innovation and that is partially a product of competition. It is only under the influence of competition that businesses are incentivised to embrace change, adapt to new processes and strive for innovation. Google’s attempt to transcend the Competition Laws and potentially monopolise the online-shopping industry goes against this very precept and thus has faced the punitive measures by the EU regulatory body.

As a concluding statement, it goes for all businesses that all conduct should be exercised with prudence to ensure that it conforms to Competition Laws and Regulations.

For more information about competition regulations and how it applies to your business, get in touch with an experienced Business Lawyer.

Let us know your thoughts on the Google incident by tagging us at #lawpath or @lawpath.

Share at:

Simplify creating legal documents today

Browse through Lawpath's AI tools which can be used to draft, review and refine legal documents today!

Related Articles

How to Start a Removalist Business: 7 Easy Steps to Get You Started

Starting a removalist business means you'll be offering a service in constant demand. Find out how to get started in this guide.

How To Start a Not-for-Profit Organisation: A Guide to Helping People

Want to give back to the community or contribute to a cause you care about? Find out how to start a Not-for-Profit Organisation here.

How to Start a Lawn Mowing Business: A Clear Path to Success

Want to know how to start a lawn mowing business? Then, this post is for you! Here are some easy steps for success.

How Do Consignment Agreements Work?

Want to sell your goods without dealing with customers? Read this article to learn how to make consignment agreements work for you.

Why You Should Never Copy A Terms & Conditions

Although it may be tempting, you should never copy your terms and conditions from another website. Read more to find out why.

Enterprise Agreement vs Employment Agreement (2026 Update)

An employment agreement is negotiated between you and your employee, whereas an enterprise agreement is negotiated by a Union on behalf of multiple workers.