Internet Giant Google takes a record $3.57 billion fine

Table of Contents

Share at:

This is what happened yesterday when Google was fined a record of $3.57 billion by an EU competition regulator for breach of antitrust rules. To give some context, the original record for fines of this nature was $1.56 billion, awarded to Intel in 2009. The EU agency awarded the fine due to alleged attempts by Google to modify its search engine processes to provide illegal competitive advantages to its own products. In effect, Google products were placed first in searches while rival products would not appear until page 4 of searches. Firstly, this meant that consumers did not have a genuine range of options to choose from during shopping and secondly, this constituted anti-competitive conduct that is detrimental to the online shopping industry.

The Consequences

The fine devalued Google’s stock prices and this triggered a domino effect, causing other related major companies to drop in stock prices. The parent company, Alphabet lost up to $8.5 billion in value and various related stocks such as NASDAQ and Facebook fell in values of up to 1.61% and 5% respectively.

Financial losses aside, Google’s loss of reputation is arguably the most damaging for the corporation. Historically, many firms in similar positions have had themselves losing the best university talent to other competitors.

Context into the Competition Law

Antitrust law is basically another term for Competition Law. In Australia business competition is regulated by an independent body, the Australian Consumer and Competition Commission (ACCC) which operates under the Consumer and Competition Act 2010 (Cth).

In essence, the body promotes fair competition within Australian businesses and prevents any anti-competitive conduct – such as illegal monopolisation.

Final Thoughts

In this day and age, so much of our world’s progress stems from our prominent culture of innovation and that is partially a product of competition. It is only under the influence of competition that businesses are incentivised to embrace change, adapt to new processes and strive for innovation. Google’s attempt to transcend the Competition Laws and potentially monopolise the online-shopping industry goes against this very precept and thus has faced the punitive measures by the EU regulatory body.

As a concluding statement, it goes for all businesses that all conduct should be exercised with prudence to ensure that it conforms to Competition Laws and Regulations.

For more information about competition regulations and how it applies to your business, get in touch with an experienced Business Lawyer.

Let us know your thoughts on the Google incident by tagging us at #lawpath or @lawpath.

Share at:

Simplify creating legal documents today

Browse through Lawpath's AI tools which can be used to draft, review and refine legal documents today!

Related Articles

A Guide to NES: The 11 Employment Entitlements

Understanding an employers obligations under NES is extremely important. Read on for more about NES: The 11 Employment Entitlements.

What’s the Difference Between Redundancy and Severance Pay?

Upon termination employees are often entitled to different forms of compensation. Here we discuss two of them - redundancy and severance pay.

Contractor Versus Subcontractor: What’s the Difference? (2026 Update)

As a business owner, it's likely you'll have to hire a contractor and subcontractor at some point. Read this guide to find out what they are.

Garden Leave: Advantages and Disadvantages

Wondering if you should have a garden leave clause in your employment contract? Check out the advantages and disadvantages of garden leave.

What is Long Service Leave in Western Australia?

Long Service Leave in Western Australia may have different requirements to other Australian jurisdictions.

What Is Long Service Leave in New South Wales?

Long service leave entitlements vary depending on which state you work in. Learn more about entitlements to long service leave (NSW) here.