Employer Liable: Failure to Investigate Sexual Harassment Claim

Table of Contents

Share at:

A Queensland tribunal recently found an employer was liable after it failed to properly investigate a sexual harassment claim brought by one of its employees. (McCauley v Club Resort Holdings Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] QCAT 243 (13 May 2013))

The case involved a sexual harassment claim made by a food and beverage attendant against a chef with whom she worked. The attendant claimed the chef had made derogatory comments to her over a number of days and made growling noises in her ear and around her neck.

The tribunal was very unimpressed with the way in which the investigation was conducted. The HR Manager who conducted the investigation was criticised for:

  • Failing to obtain a full account of events from the attendant.
  • Not putting the attendant’s account to the chef (the first time her version of events was put to him was at the hearing).
  • Not advising the attendant that an investigator had been appointed.
  • Not interviewing other witnesses said to be present when some of the derogatory comments were made.

The employer’s response to the complaint and its subsequent investigation were described as “inept and unprofessional”, and the employer was ordered to pay the attendant $35,490 by way of compensation.

Take claims of workplace harassment seriously

This unfortunate example serves as a reminder for employers when dealing with a complaint by an employee:

  • Ensure you have clearly communicated workplace policies that set out what constitutes acceptable and unacceptable behaviour.
  • Have a clearly communicated complaints process in place to deal with complaints about breaches of these policies.
  • Consistently follow the complaints process.

You cannot always control how your employees behave; but if you fail to follow up complaints of harassment in a professional manner, it could cost you dearly.

Christine Broad, Solicitor, BlandsLaw

Don’t know where to start? Contact us on 1800 529 728 to learn more about customising legal documents and obtaining a fixed-fee quote from Australia’s largest lawyer marketplace.

Share at:

Simplify creating legal documents today

Browse through Lawpath's AI tools which can be used to draft, review and refine legal documents today!

Related Articles

Disposing Of Shares – An Explainer For Shareholders

Disposing of shares can occur through share sales or transfers, but the process differs between public and private companies. Find out more here.

A Guide to Directors’ Duties in Australia: The 6 Duties You Need to Know (2026 Update)

Understand your core directors’ duties in Australia. These are not optional - they are essential legal obligations. Ensure compliance with our full guide.

The Difference Between Promissory Notes & Loan Agreements

A promissory note and a loan agreement both outline arrangements for repaying borrowed money, however their legal connotations differ.

Discretionary Trusts vs Unit Trusts (2026 Update)

When establishing a trust, it's important to know the different types. Find out how discretionary and unit trusts work here.

Competition Permits in Australia: A State-by-State Breakdown

Do you know when competition permits are required in Australia? Read this article to find out when they’re required in every state.

Casual Loading: When Do Employers Pay It?

Employers should be aware of when they need to pay their employees casual loading. Keep reading to find out when this applies.