Employer Liable: Failure to Investigate Sexual Harassment Claim

Table of Contents

Share at:

A Queensland tribunal recently found an employer was liable after it failed to properly investigate a sexual harassment claim brought by one of its employees. (McCauley v Club Resort Holdings Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] QCAT 243 (13 May 2013))

The case involved a sexual harassment claim made by a food and beverage attendant against a chef with whom she worked. The attendant claimed the chef had made derogatory comments to her over a number of days and made growling noises in her ear and around her neck.

The tribunal was very unimpressed with the way in which the investigation was conducted. The HR Manager who conducted the investigation was criticised for:

  • Failing to obtain a full account of events from the attendant.
  • Not putting the attendant’s account to the chef (the first time her version of events was put to him was at the hearing).
  • Not advising the attendant that an investigator had been appointed.
  • Not interviewing other witnesses said to be present when some of the derogatory comments were made.

The employer’s response to the complaint and its subsequent investigation were described as “inept and unprofessional”, and the employer was ordered to pay the attendant $35,490 by way of compensation.

Take claims of workplace harassment seriously

This unfortunate example serves as a reminder for employers when dealing with a complaint by an employee:

  • Ensure you have clearly communicated workplace policies that set out what constitutes acceptable and unacceptable behaviour.
  • Have a clearly communicated complaints process in place to deal with complaints about breaches of these policies.
  • Consistently follow the complaints process.

You cannot always control how your employees behave; but if you fail to follow up complaints of harassment in a professional manner, it could cost you dearly.

Christine Broad, Solicitor, BlandsLaw

Don’t know where to start? Contact us on 1800 529 728 to learn more about customising legal documents and obtaining a fixed-fee quote from Australia’s largest lawyer marketplace.

Share at:

Simplify creating legal documents today

Browse through Lawpath's AI tools which can be used to draft, review and refine legal documents today!

Related Articles

Red food truck with its serving hatch open

How to Start a Food Truck Business in Australia: Licences, Permits and Costs

Starting a food truck business in Australia means getting the right registrations, state and council licences, and enough capital to cover setup.
Small business owner packing handmade products into boxes

TM vs ® Symbol: When You Can Use Each in Australia

Use TM on any mark you are claiming. The ® symbol is only for marks registered with IP Australia, and using it too early can be an offence.
Employee working on a laptop from home

Clerks Award Working From Home Rules: What Employers Need to Do

From 26 October 2026 the Clerks Award includes a working from home clause. What employers must put in writing, and how it sits beside section 65.
Office colleagues working side by side at laptops in a shared workplace.

Secondment in Australia: How It Works and What Employers Must Put in Writing

A secondment lets you lend an employee to a client or a related company without losing them. The risk sits in what you put in writing before day one.
Hands on an open reference book beside a laptop on a white desk

Loop engineering, applied to a law firm

Loop engineering, applied to a law firm. How our lawyers keep Cygnet, our legal AI model, current after each advice call, and the tests it must pass.
Hands in a suit typing on a laptop beside legal folders

What an AI-native law firm is, and how to test one

An AI-native law firm uses AI to draft and check documents, then an Australian lawyer signs off. Here is how Lawpath Legal works and what to ask any firm.