Olivia is the Head of Legal at Lawpath, where she helps Australian businesses navigate complex legal challenges with practical, commercially minded advice. She specialises in employment matters, contract drafting, pre-litigation strategy, dispute resolution, commercial law and startup compliance, and has supported clients across technology, healthcare, professional services and retail. Olivia is passionate about making legal services accessible, personable and effective for every client.
To respond to a cease and desist letter, read it properly, diarise the deadline, keep your evidence, check whether the claim actually stands up, then reply in writing or comply before time runs out. A cease and desist letter is a written demand to stop something the sender says breaches their rights. It isn’t a court order. On its own, it doesn’t bind you to anything.
Here’s what nobody says out loud. When one of these lands in your inbox, most people do one of two things: panic and agree to everything, or bin it and hope it disappears. Both get expensive. A calm reply, sent on time, ends plenty of these disputes with a letter or two instead of a court date.
- It’s a demand, not a court order. Ignoring it won’t get you fined. It can still cost you later if the sender sues and a judge looks at how you behaved.
- The deadline belongs to the sender, not a court. A short holding reply buys you time to get advice without admitting a thing.
- Keep everything. Change nothing yet. Deleting posts or files before you’ve had advice can look like getting rid of evidence.
- Bluffing has a price for the sender too. Unjustified threats of trade mark, patent, design or copyright action give you your own right to go to court.
- Don’t sign undertakings in a hurry. They’re binding promises, and many have no end date.
Is a cease and desist letter legally binding in Australia?
No. A cease and desist letter is a warning shot, not a judgment. Nobody can fine you, freeze your accounts or force you to rebrand because of a letter. Only a court order or a binding agreement can do that.
Where founders get caught out is assuming “not binding” means “doesn’t matter”. The letter is often the first exhibit in a court file. It proves you were told about the problem on a specific date, so anything you keep doing after that looks deliberate. In IP disputes, deliberate infringement is what pushes damages up.
It also doesn’t matter whether it came by email, post or a social media DM. Saying you never saw it rarely helps, and it won’t stop the clock. If you want the basics on how these letters are built, our guide on what a cease and desist letter is covers it.
What happens if you ignore a cease and desist letter?
Legally, nothing happens straight away. You have no duty to reply. Practically, silence hands the sender the story. Expect one of three things: a firmer follow-up letter, a complaint to a platform like Instagram or Amazon to pull your listings, or court papers.
Silence can also hurt you on costs. In the Federal Court, the Civil Dispute Resolution Act 2011 (Cth) requires each side to file a statement setting out the genuine steps they took to resolve the dispute before going to court. Ignoring every letter makes that statement awkward to write. Judges notice.
There’s one situation where staying quiet is a fair call: the claim is clearly baseless, you’ve had advice, and engaging would only feed it. That’s a strategy. Not opening the envelope isn’t.
Is a cease and desist letter just a scare tactic?
Sometimes. Plenty of letters are sent to make a competitor flinch, not because the sender would win in court. Tell the difference by testing what’s in the letter, not how scary it sounds.
| Signs it’s a real threat | Signs it’s mostly bluff |
|---|---|
| Names a specific registered trade mark number, contract clause or published work | Talks vaguely about “our rights” without pointing to anything |
| Attaches dated screenshots, invoices or other evidence | Has no evidence, just accusations |
| Asks for something proportionate, like removing one image | Demands a full rebrand, a large payment and a public apology all at once |
| Gives a workable deadline, usually 7 to 14 days | Gives you 24 or 48 hours to “avoid immediate proceedings” |
| Comes from a lawyer who invites a reply | Threatens criminal charges or police action over a civil issue |
A letter can tick boxes on both sides. Treat bluff signals as a reason to push back calmly, never as a reason to ignore it.
What should you do in the first 48 hours?
1. Don’t reply angry, and don’t reply in public
The urge to post “look who’s bullying a small business” is real. Resist it. A public post can hand the sender a fresh claim, and the letter itself is often protected from defamation claims because it was sent in the course of a dispute. Your Instagram story isn’t.
2. Diarise the deadline
Put the response date in your calendar with a reminder three days earlier. Missing it rarely kills your case. It does tell the other side you aren’t taking this seriously, and that changes how they negotiate.
3. Preserve the evidence before you change anything
Screenshot the website pages, social posts, product listings and packaging the letter complains about, with dates showing. Save the design files, the emails with your designer and the invoice for that stock photo. Then stop. Don’t delete or edit anything until you’ve had advice. Changing material too early can wreck the timeline that proves you got there first.
4. Tell the people who need to know
That means your co-founders or business partners, and your insurer. Many professional indemnity and management liability policies require you to notify them as soon as you’re aware of something that could become a claim. Late notice can void your cover. Check the policy wording today, not after the court papers arrive.
5. Send a short holding reply if you need time
Two or three lines is enough. Acknowledge receipt, say you’re getting advice, and say you’ll respond by a set date. No apologies, no explanations, no admissions. Most senders accept a reasonable extension, and asking for one makes you look organised rather than evasive.
Does the claim against you actually hold up?
Here’s the wrong assumption we see constantly: recipients take it for granted that the sender’s rights are as broad as the letter says. Often they aren’t. Your first real job is checking what the sender actually owns, then whether your conduct touches it.
| Type of letter | What to check first | Where it often falls over |
|---|---|---|
| Trade mark | Search IP Australia’s trade mark register: is the mark registered, who owns it, and which goods and services it covers? | The mark covers different goods or services, or the shared word is generic or descriptive |
| Copyright | Who created the work, when, and whether you had a licence | Copyright protects the expression, not the idea or a general style |
| Product design | Is the design registered, and is the registration still in force? Registered designs last a maximum of 10 years. | The design was never registered, or the registration has lapsed |
| Breach of contract | Find the signed contract and read the exact clause cited | The clause doesn’t say what the letter says, or a restraint is too broad to enforce |
| Defamation | Is it a formal concerns notice? Was the statement true? Who is complaining? | Most companies with 10 or more employees can’t sue for defamation, and true statements have a defence |
| Image licensing demand | Is the image still up? Did you pay for a licence? | Once the image is removed, the dispute shrinks to money, and the first number is an opening offer |
Copyright letters deserve a closer look because there’s no registration system to check. Copyright arises automatically, so the fight is about who created what and when. Our explainer on direct vs indirect copyright infringement helps if the letter blames you for something a contractor or customer did.
Defamation letters have their own rules. In most states and territories, a person has to send a formal concerns notice before they can sue. You then have 28 days to make an “offer to make amends”, such as a correction or a takedown. A reasonable offer that’s refused can become a defence later, so this window matters. Our guide to what counts as defamation explains the basics.
Get a free legal document when you sign up to Lawpath
What are your options for a cease and desist response?
Once you know how strong the claim is, you have four realistic ways to respond to a cease and desist letter. Pick based on two questions: how strong is their case, and how much would compliance hurt your business?
Comply
If the claim is solid and the fix is cheap, just fix it. Swapping out one photo or renaming one product line costs far less than a single round of legal letters. Confirm in writing what you’ve changed and when. Don’t add an apology that reads like an admission of everything else in the letter.
Negotiate a middle ground
This is where most sensible disputes land. You might agree to add a disclaimer, change a logo colour, phase out old stock over 60 days or use a plain descriptive word instead of the contested one. Proposals like these work best in a letter marked “without prejudice”. That generally stops it being used against you in court as an admission.
Deny and defend
If the claim is weak, say so, briefly and with evidence. Set out the facts, attach proof of your earlier use or independent creation, and ask the sender to withdraw. Skip the legal essay. A tight two-page reply carries more weight than ten pages of outrage.
For IP letters, there’s an extra card most recipients don’t know they hold. The Trade Marks Act 1995, Patents Act 1990, Designs Act 2003 and Copyright Act 1968 all let a person who receives an unjustified threat of infringement proceedings take the sender to court. Remedies include a declaration, an injunction and damages. Since February 2019, courts can award additional damages for unjustified trade mark, patent and design threats. Simply telling you a registered trade mark exists isn’t a threat. “Stop or we’ll sue” can be.
You don’t need to rush to court to use this. Pointing out the risk politely in your reply is often enough to make a bluffing sender rethink.
Stay silent
Only on advice, and only when the claim is obviously empty. Silence closes off negotiation and makes you look disengaged if things escalate. For most small businesses, a short firm reply beats silence every time.
How do you write a response to a cease and desist letter?
Keep it short, factual and calm. Write it as if a judge will read it one day, because one might. Here’s a sample structure that works for most replies:
- Reference line. Their letter’s date, author and any reference number.
- Your position in one sentence. For example: “We do not accept that our use of the name infringes your client’s registered trade mark.”
- The key facts. When you started using it, how you came up with it, and what your goods or services actually are.
- Your evidence. Dated screenshots, invoices, design files or a licence, listed as attachments.
- What you will and won’t do. Either “we will take no further action” or a specific, limited offer.
- A reservation of rights. One line keeping your options open, including any unjustified threats claim.
Want to see the other side of the coin? Lawpath’s copyright cease and desist template shows exactly what a sender is expected to include. Reading it first makes it easy to spot what’s missing from the letter you received.
What we see in Lawpath consultations
Lawpath lawyers handle cease and desist matters from both sides every month. A few patterns come up again and again.
The deadline is softer than it looks. Clients often treat the date in the letter as a court date. It isn’t. A common first move from our lawyers is a short acknowledgement that the matter is under review. It keeps things calm and stops the sender escalating while the real response is prepared.
The sender’s rights are narrower than claimed. In trade mark disputes, the defence often rests on how different the marks really are, a shared word that’s generic, different goods or services, or thin evidence of reputation. In design disputes, clients are regularly surprised to learn the design was never registered at all.
You can’t speak for people who haven’t agreed. When a reply says it’s on behalf of a group, such as co-owners, bandmates or business partners, our lawyers ask for written consent from each person first. Skip that and the letter can be challenged, or someone in the group can disown it.
Silence after your reply is normal. It’s common for the other side to go quiet after a firm response, even past their own deadline. That’s often a good sign, but it isn’t a formal end. Keep the file, and don’t start using the disputed material again without advice.
Most disputes run more than one round. The sender replies to your reply, and you reply again. Ask upfront whether a quote covers follow-up letters, because they’re often scoped separately.
What mistakes make a cease and desist letter worse?
- Signing their undertaking as drafted. Undertakings written by the sender are usually broader than they need to be, with no end date. Narrow the scope before you sign anything.
- Apologising for everything. “Sorry, we didn’t realise” is a kind instinct and a terrible legal sentence. It can read as an admission.
- Calling the sender directly to “sort it out”. If a lawyer sent the letter, anything you say on that call can be noted and quoted back to you.
- Quietly deleting material. It can destroy your own proof of first use and look like you’re hiding something.
- Countersuing on day one. Rushing to file your own claim first, US-style, is rarely the right move in Australia. An unjustified threats claim is a real option, but it’s a step to take on advice, not in anger.
Do you need a lawyer to respond to a cease and desist letter?
Not always. If the claim is plainly right and the fix is small, you can comply and confirm it yourself. Get a lawyer when the letter asks you to sign an undertaking, pay money, change your business name, or comes from a law firm about IP you rely on. A lawyer’s letterhead also changes the tone. Senders who were bluffing tend to back off once they see a lawyer is involved.
Cost is the worry that stops most founders picking up the phone. Through Lawpath, you get a fixed-fee quote from an intellectual property lawyer before any work starts, so there’s no hourly meter running in the background. Ask whether follow-up correspondence is included, and whether you can review the draft before it goes out. You should be able to.
Our post on why a lawyer should send a cease and desist letter looks at the same question from the sender’s side. It’s a useful read if you’re thinking about firing back.
How do you stop this happening again?
Once the dust settles, spend an hour on prevention. It’s far cheaper than the next letter.
- Search before you name anything. Check the trade mark register before you launch a brand, product or domain.
- Register your own brand. A registered trade mark turns “we were here first” into a right you can actually enforce.
- Keep licences for every image and font. A folder of receipts ends most image licensing demands in one email.
- Get IP ownership in writing. Your designer and developer contracts should assign the IP to your business, not leave it with them.
If you’re ever on the other side, you can create your own cease and desist letter in minutes. Lawpath’s library of 550+ legal templates is built for exactly this kind of moment. And if it’s a bigger dispute, read up on the things to consider before taking legal action before you hit send.
Frequently asked questions
How long do I have to respond to a cease and desist letter?
Whatever the letter says, commonly 7 to 14 days. That deadline is set by the sender, not a court. If you need longer, send a short holding reply asking for an extension. Most senders agree to a reasonable request.
Can I be sued if I ignore a cease and desist letter?
Yes. Ignoring the letter doesn’t stop the sender going to court, and it can count against you on costs. In the Federal Court, both sides have to show the genuine steps they took to resolve the dispute first.
Can I respond to a cease and desist letter without a lawyer?
Yes, especially if you’re simply complying. Get advice before you sign an undertaking, agree to pay money, or deny a claim about IP your business depends on. A fixed-fee lawyer keeps the cost predictable.
How do I know if a cease and desist letter is a scare tactic?
Look for specifics. Real threats name a registration number, a contract clause or a particular work, and attach evidence. Bluffs rely on vague “rights”, extreme demands and very short deadlines. Either way, reply calmly rather than ignoring it.
What is an unjustified threat?
It’s a threat of trade mark, patent, design or copyright infringement proceedings that the sender can’t back up. Australian IP laws let the recipient seek a declaration, an injunction and damages. For trade marks, patents and designs, courts can also award additional damages.
How do I respond to a cease and desist letter for defamation?
Check whether it’s a formal concerns notice. If it is, you have 28 days to make an offer to make amends, such as a correction or a takedown. Don’t repost or defend the statement publicly while you decide.
Should I sign the undertaking attached to the letter?
Not as drafted. Undertakings are binding promises, and the sender writes them to suit themselves. Negotiate the scope, add an end date where you can, and only sign what you can comply with forever.
Is there a sample response to a cease and desist letter?
A good reply has six parts: a reference to their letter, your position in one sentence, the key facts, your evidence, what you will or won’t do, and a reservation of rights. Keep it to two pages.
Is a cease and desist letter sent by email valid?
Yes. Email, post and even social media messages all count as notice. Saying you didn’t see it rarely helps, so check your spam folder and respond on time.
You’ve got this
Getting a cease and desist letter doesn’t mean you’ve done something wrong. It means someone has made a claim, and you get to answer it. Plenty of founders have been exactly where you are and come out with their brand, their business and their sanity intact.
Your next step is simple: get a fixed-fee quote from a Lawpath lawyer to review the letter before your deadline.
