Should executives be held responsible for data breaches?

Table of Contents

Share at:

On 27 September, it was announced by the Board of Equifax that CEO Richard Smith amongst other executives had stepped down from their roles following the disclosure of a hacking scandal. It was alleged that the perpetrators gained unauthorised access to sensitive personal data held by Equifax, including social security numbers, birth dates and home addresses. Over 143 million Americans were exposed – nearly half the country’s population.

It was alleged that the hack was possible because Equifax failed to act on warnings to fix a software security problem.

Law Reform: Should executives be held accountable?

The story has been attracting attention for a reason other than just the privacy breach. Those who were responsible face the prospect of walking free. Smith would be able to enjoy his retirement that includes a large pension and other executives would have the benefit of keeping the profit from the sale of stock that they transacted before publicly announcing the breach.

The policy question remains: is it fair for executives to walk free in the face of damage done to millions of Americans?

This was the subject of intense debate in the US Congressional Hearing in Washington which Smith attended on 3 October 2017. Many were of the view that it was not justified that executives not only avoid the repercussions but were able to leave with all the benefits. Sen. Elizabeth Warren pushed for legislative reform that penalises executives and companies that fail to take reasonable measures for cyber safety and that result in public harm.

On the other hand, Smith maintained that punitive measures are not ideal given that the company plays a ‘vital role in the economy.’

Final Thoughts

Whilst the Equifax hacking incident is primarily focused on accountability of fault-bearing executives, another message is clear. In today’s technologically advanced society, hackers are finding more and more ways to access private information. Therefore, especially for data-holding companies, this calls for more advanced countermeasures as well as tech-savvy personnel to reduce the risk of such occurrences taking place.

Let us know your thoughts on the Equifax scandal as well as the frailty of privacy by tagging us #lawpath or @lawpath

Share at:

Simplify creating legal documents today

Browse through Lawpath's AI tools which can be used to draft, review and refine legal documents today!

Related Articles

Do You Need an NDA Before Opening Your Books to a Business Buyer?

Learn how to draft and manage an NDA when selling a business. From key clauses to extra precautions, we help you protect your business interests.

How to Resolve a Dispute Between 50/50 Shareholders

Shareholder deadlock can be extremely stressful. Prevent it with a strong shareholders’ agreement. Too late? Our guide outlines the steps you can take.

Is a Partnership Right for My Business? (Australian Guide)

Are you wondering if a partnership is right for your business? This guide will walk you through the decision-making process to help you determine the best business structure for your situation.

Difference Between a General and Enduring Power of Attorney (2026 Update)

Which do you need: General vs Enduring Power of Attorney? This guide walks you through the differences and typical legal scenarios.

What Happens to Shares when a Shareholder Dies?

Unsure what happens to shares when a shareholder dies? Shares don’t just disappear, and several legal documents affect the outcome. This guide covers the details.

Is It Legal for Directors to Borrow Money From Their Company?

As a director, you may be able to take out a loan from your company. Read on for more information.