Lawpath Blog
What’s the Difference Between Guarantees and Indemnities?

What’s the Difference Between Guarantees and Indemnities?

Although similar, guarantees and indemnities are uniquely different. Here is a basic guide explaining their differences.

11th February 2019

Guarantees and indemnities are legal terms which often appear as clauses of loan agreements. These clauses protect lenders from risk by a borrower. However, both are distinct from each other, and each serve a particular function. In this blog post we’ll discuss the key differences between guarantees and indemnities.


A guarantee is a contractual promise where a third party (the ‘guarantor’) answers for another party (the ‘obligor’) who owes an obligation towards the ‘beneficiary’. In essence, one party will answer for the payment or performance of another person’s debt or obligation in the event that the party primarily responsible for it fails to fulfil their obligation. There are three parties to a guarantee:

  • The ‘guarantor’ offers the promise
  • The ‘obligor’ fulfils the obligation and;
  • The ‘beneficiary’ is the party which the obligor owes the obligation towards

The obligations do not only refer to money but can also refer to a promise to perform a duty. As seen its definition, a guarantee is complex because it is a promise to answer for a third party’s obligation. In fact, the guarantor is not necessarily obliged to secure the performance of the obligor. Rather, the guarantor will compensate for the loss caused by the obligor failing to fulfil the obligation.


Similarly, an indemnity is a contractual promise by one party (the ‘indemnifier’) to compensate for loss suffered by another party (the ‘beneficiary’). In essence, the indemnifier will keep the beneficiary harmless against loss from entering a transaction with a third party. There are two parties to an indemnity:

  • The ‘indemnifier’ promises to compensate for loss and;
  • The ‘beneficiary’ is protected by the indemnifier in the case that harm is caused as a result of entering into a transaction with a third party

From its definition, indemnity is a much simpler concept whereby the party offering the promise pays for the loss suffered by the wrongdoing of a third party.


Comparing the two can be difficult to visualise but there are key differences between them.

Guarantees depend on the obligor fulfilling their obligation before an answer must be made by a guarantor. In fact, guarantees consist of two liabilities:

  • The liability of the obligor to the beneficiary
  • The liability of the guarantor to the obligor

In a nutshell, both the party required to fulfil the obligation and the party guaranteeing the obligation have liability. A guarantor does not need to answer for the obligor for a fulfilled obligation.

Indemnity contains what is known as ‘primary liability’ where the indemnifier is directly liable. If the promisee experiences loss from a transaction with a third party, the indemnifier will compensate for the loss. Another party does not have an obligation they must fulfil for the indemnifier to be liable.

In conclusion, a guarantee involves a party answering for debt or default of another party. Whereas, an indemnity is a direct liability for a party to compensate loss occurring from the wrongdoing of a third party.

Determining whether a contract contains a guarantee or indemnity can be difficult to determine. Courts often need to consider the contract terms as a whole. As such, consider speaking to a trust lawyer if you have concerns about either.

Don’t know where to start? Contact a LawPath consultant on 1800 529 728 to learn more about customising legal documents and obtaining a fixed-fee quote from Australia’s largest legal marketplace.


Christopher Cruz

Chris is a legal intern at Lawpath, and is currently studying a Bachelor of Laws at Macquarie University. He is interested in commercial and IT law.